Talk:Supported Devices

From DD-WRT Wiki

Revision as of 04:16, 27 July 2007 by 220.253.148.131 (Talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents


Best range using built-in antenna

Does anyone know if the WHR-HP-AG108 would achieve better ranges than the WHR-HP-G54?

This page has some numbers for the WHR-HP-AG108: http://www.buffalo-technology.com/products/product-detail.php?productid=167&categoryid=28

Antenna Total Gain 2.4 GHz: 5.5 dBi (max); 5 GHz: 7.5 dBi (max.)

I couldn’t find anything on the WHR-HP-G54. Hal 15:09, 16 Feb 2007 (CET)


I would say that the WHR-HP-G54, would almost have to have a smaller range then the AG108 because the high-gain ant. you can purchase for the G54s is only 4.4DBi (Max) for 2.4 Ghz. Seeing as the High Gain replaces the original, the original must be weaker. --Cbruscato 06:59, 11 Mar 2007 (CET)

Supported Hardware Table

!!!!!! BELKIN F5D7230-4 !!!! Router says version 1223df on the back, dd-wrt recognises as v1000 (so it is in fact a v1000?). Unit is sold in Europe. Should this be added to the SHT? also, users should not flash OpenWRT on their belkin f5d7230-4 after flashing dd-wrt on it, OpenWRT does something that resets all your MAC adresses to Siemens SE505 ones, unable to restore original settings, in the end I got a bricked router because I did "mtd -r erase pmon". "mtd -r erase rootfs" is write protected, erasing nvram, jffs and linux does nothing bad, the router just reboots clean.


I made this table in a spreadsheet program and converted it to wiki markup with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd

If you want to make big changes to the table I suggest you do that to to save yourself some time. :)

The table is kind of huge now, and there seems to be quite allot of info that is not realy needed (eg does anyone need to know what the CPU model is?) Also many of the routers seem to be no longer in production, or very hard to find...

Perhaps it would be best to have 2 tables, one for currently avalable hardware for people looking to buy a router to put DD-WRT on, and another for every router possible.

Hal 23:56, 19 Feb 2007 (CET)

Readability of Hardware Table

I have splited the table into Box and Board based Routers. Because most of the "home users" would prefer a boxed router. So i hope the table looks a littel bit more clearly.

I think that the Box based router table can be splited agin into A/B/G and n-Draft models. Because the users are looking for these new routers as you can see in the forums. And most of the supported routers in future will be n-Draft Models by v24.

Another thing which i recommend is that only you span rows for one model of a router. Since not the table gets unreadable, just see the edited Linksys part.

Spontex 07:42, 19 Apr 2007 (CEST)

Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) >= v5

Poor grammar in this section cleaned up. Also, Linux vs Windows nonsense (essentially stating that Windows users would not be able to handle using certain units) rephrased to inform without insulting.

Glossary

What is meant by "PoE" in the table?
- Rekoil 07:49, 15 Jul 2007 (CEST)

Bold warning about do not attempt flash

Perhaps we should have a big bold table with routers not to attempt to flash (eg 300N v2 or v1.1) etc