http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&action=history&feed=atom Talk:Supported Devices - Revision history 2024-03-29T05:50:26Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.10.1 http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=34622&oldid=prev Cassowarry: /* D-Link DIR-300 rev D1 */ 2010-07-19T18:57:25Z <p><span class="autocomment">D-Link DIR-300 rev D1</span></p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 18:57, 19 July 2010</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 82:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 82:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== All the Froogle links are broken ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== All the Froogle links are broken ==</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">The format is like this nowadays: http://www.google.com/products?q=asus.wl-500g+&amp;btnG=Search+Products --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">The format is like this nowadays: http://www.google.com/products?q=asus.wl-500g+&amp;btnG=Search+Products --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">== D-Link DIR-300 rev D1 ==</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">Does anyone know if this device is supported as well and if it has to be flashed like the DIR-600 (like DIR-300 rev B1)?</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">P.S. I'm new here, so I don't know if this is the right place for questions like this.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> </table> Cassowarry http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=34621&oldid=prev Cassowarry: D-Link DIR-300 rev D1 2010-07-19T18:51:39Z <p>D-Link DIR-300 rev D1</p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 18:51, 19 July 2010</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 82:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 82:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== All the Froogle links are broken ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== All the Froogle links are broken ==</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">The format is like this nowadays: http://www.google.com/products?q=asus.wl-500g+&amp;btnG=Search+Products --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">The format is like this nowadays: http://www.google.com/products?q=asus.wl-500g+&amp;btnG=Search+Products --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">== D-Link DIR-300 rev D1 ==</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">Does anyone know if this device is supported as well and if it has to be flashed like the DIR-600 (like DIR-300 rev B1)?</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">P.S. I'm new here, so I don't know if this is the right place for questions like this.</td></tr> </table> Cassowarry http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=34023&oldid=prev Sash: /* WZR-G300N */ cleared 2010-06-23T15:52:30Z <p><span class="autocomment">WZR-G300N -</span> cleared</p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 15:52, 23 June 2010</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 82:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 82:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== All the Froogle links are broken ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== All the Froogle links are broken ==</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">The format is like this nowadays: http://www.google.com/products?q=asus.wl-500g+&amp;btnG=Search+Products --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">The format is like this nowadays: http://www.google.com/products?q=asus.wl-500g+&amp;btnG=Search+Products --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">== WZR-G300N ==</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">WZR-G300N is listed in the table, but not in the list. Is it supported? --[[User:Tomten|Tomten]] 22:53, 30 July 2007 (CEST)</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> </table> Sash http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=34022&oldid=prev Sash: /* Readability of Hardware Table */ removed very old stuff 2010-06-23T15:50:59Z <p><span class="autocomment">Readability of Hardware Table -</span> removed very old stuff</p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 15:50, 23 June 2010</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 54:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 54:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Readability of Hardware Table ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Readability of Hardware Table ==</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">I have splited the table into Box and Board based Routers. Because most of the &quot;home users&quot; would prefer a boxed router. So i hope the table looks a littel bit more clearly.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">I think that the Box based router table can be splited agin into A/B/G and n-Draft models. Because the users are looking for these new routers as you can see in the forums. And most of the supported routers in future will be n-Draft Models by v24.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">Another thing which i recommend is that only you span rows for one model of a router. Since not the table gets unreadable, just see the edited Linksys part.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Spontex|Spontex]] 07:42, 19 Apr 2007 (CEST)</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">i not happy with the hardware table as it is at the moment. its crowded not usable and difficult to administrate. the openwrt is much better so i redesigned the board based part of the table. i deletet non interesting options and added some useful. i think such things like oc´ing shouldnt belong to such tables cause its to specific to endusers and if they havent the know how they shouldnt experiment with this settings. experienced users will find it out by themselfs.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">i spoke to eko and he´s fine with the infos in my table.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">i will change the boxbased table to but this will take some time...its lot of work</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">sash</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">I don't quite follow the necessity of the &quot;Box based Routers (all the rest that is not re-engineered til today)&quot; section. It's especially confusing when following a vendor hyperlink from the top since (for example) jumping to &quot;Linksys&quot; no longer shows all the Linksys routers-- some of them are hidden under the &quot;Box based Routers (all the rest...&quot; heading which is somewhat redundant with the overall section heading of &quot;Box based Routers&quot;.</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">Should that table be expanded and the contents moved to the appropriate vendor-specific area?</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">--[[User:Sbonds|Sbonds]] 02:17, 9 January 2008 (CET)</td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;"></td><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">I'd really like to split this into two tables, one for currently available hardware, one for discontinued hardware. Does anybody object/support that option? The table is simply far too cluttered to find useful info right now. I'll start collecting data for this this afternoon.</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">I'd really like to split this into two tables, one for currently available hardware, one for discontinued hardware. Does anybody object/support that option? The table is simply far too cluttered to find useful info right now. I'll start collecting data for this this afternoon.</td></tr> </table> Sash http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=28031&oldid=prev Bfinlay: /* Sortable Table */ 2009-11-23T21:30:50Z <p><span class="autocomment">Sortable Table</span></p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 21:30, 23 November 2009</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 19:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 19:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:27, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:27, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; font-size: smaller;">:Remember that you can use the ':' to indent a reply (or multiple '::::' for multiple levels of indent) and the '<del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:30, 23 November 2009 (CET)</del>' to sign it.[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:30, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">:Remember that you can use the ':' to indent a reply (or multiple '::::' for multiple levels of indent) and the <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;nowiki&gt;</ins>'<ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">~~~~</ins>'<ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;/nowiki&gt; </ins>to sign it.[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:30, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">==Best range using built-in antenna==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">==Best range using built-in antenna==</td></tr> </table> Bfinlay http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=28030&oldid=prev Bfinlay: /* Sortable Table */ 2009-11-23T21:30:08Z <p><span class="autocomment">Sortable Table</span></p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 21:30, 23 November 2009</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 19:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 19:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:27, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:27, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">:Remember that you can use the ':' to indent a reply (or multiple '::::' for multiple levels of indent) and the '[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:30, 23 November 2009 (CET)' to sign it.[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:30, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">==Best range using built-in antenna==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">==Best range using built-in antenna==</td></tr> </table> Bfinlay http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=28029&oldid=prev Bfinlay: /* Best range using built-in antenna */ 2009-11-23T21:27:32Z <p><span class="autocomment">Best range using built-in antenna</span></p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 21:27, 23 November 2009</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 1:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 1:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">__TOC__</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">__TOC__</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">==Sortable Table==</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">I propose converting the series of Supported Devices tables into a single sortable device table. I have already started on the work, but it has taken a little longer than I thought, in part due to experimentation to get it to work right, and in part due to the inconsistency of format between each of the seperate sub-tables.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">You can see an example of what the page with a sortable table would look like here: [[Talk:Supported_Devices/sortable]]</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">The major advantage of this is so that as a web site visitor looking to choose a platform on which to run dd-wrt, I can sort by important features to compare. For example, if I want to run the MEGA build, I can sort on the amount of flash memory so that I can look at platforms that have enough to run the Mega build.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">Another advantage is that by putting all of the tables into a single table, the columns are aligned for each product, which makes it very easy to scan the table and make comparisons.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">Another advantage is that being a single table, as a user I can copy this table and paste it into Excel to do further analysis. This is very difficult to do with sub-tables.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">The disadvantages are:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">* a single table is a little harder to maintain than seperate tables with their own editing subsections</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">* The table of contents relies on section headers to build a list of sections automatically. Since section headers cannot be used within a table, they cannot be generated automatically. However, it is still possible to provide an index of manufacturers with links that jump automatically to the section within the table. See the working example at [[Talk:Supported Devices/sortable]]</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">What do you think? If there are major objections, let me know ASAP so that I do not waste more time building the document. On the other hand, if you like it, let me know ASAP so that I '''do''' spend more time finishing the document.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Bfinlay|Bfinlay]] 22:27, 23 November 2009 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">==Best range using built-in antenna==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">==Best range using built-in antenna==</td></tr> </table> Bfinlay http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=21766&oldid=prev Gleblanc: /* Readability of Hardware Table */ 2008-08-26T13:33:06Z <p><span class="autocomment">Readability of Hardware Table</span></p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 13:33, 26 August 2008</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 56:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 56:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">--[[User:Sbonds|Sbonds]] 02:17, 9 January 2008 (CET)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">--[[User:Sbonds|Sbonds]] 02:17, 9 January 2008 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">I'd really like to split this into two tables, one for currently available hardware, one for discontinued hardware. Does anybody object/support that option? The table is simply far too cluttered to find useful info right now. I'll start collecting data for this this afternoon.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">--[[User:gleblanc|gleblanc]] August 26, 2008</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) &gt;= v5 ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) &gt;= v5 ==</td></tr> </table> Gleblanc http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=18444&oldid=prev Sbonds: /* Readability of Hardware Table */ Box based Routers (all the rest that is not re-engineered til today) table doesn't make sense with vendor breakout 2008-01-09T01:17:59Z <p><span class="autocomment">Readability of Hardware Table -</span> Box based Routers (all the rest that is not re-engineered til today) table doesn't make sense with vendor breakout</p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 01:17, 9 January 2008</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 50:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 50:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">sash</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">sash</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">I don't quite follow the necessity of the &quot;Box based Routers (all the rest that is not re-engineered til today)&quot; section. It's especially confusing when following a vendor hyperlink from the top since (for example) jumping to &quot;Linksys&quot; no longer shows all the Linksys routers-- some of them are hidden under the &quot;Box based Routers (all the rest...&quot; heading which is somewhat redundant with the overall section heading of &quot;Box based Routers&quot;.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">Should that table be expanded and the contents moved to the appropriate vendor-specific area?</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">--[[User:Sbonds|Sbonds]] 02:17, 9 January 2008 (CET)</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) &gt;= v5 ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) &gt;= v5 ==</td></tr> </table> Sbonds http://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supported_Devices&diff=17965&oldid=prev Sash: /* Readability of Hardware Table */ 2007-12-01T14:40:41Z <p><span class="autocomment">Readability of Hardware Table</span></p> <table border='0' width='98%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='4' style="background-color: white;"> <tr> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' width='50%' align='center' style="background-color: white;">Revision as of 14:40, 1 December 2007</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 42:</strong></td> <td colspan="2" align="left"><strong>Line 42:</strong></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Spontex|Spontex]] 07:42, 19 Apr 2007 (CEST)</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">[[User:Spontex|Spontex]] 07:42, 19 Apr 2007 (CEST)</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">i not happy with the hardware table as it is at the moment. its crowded not usable and difficult to administrate. the openwrt is much better so i redesigned the board based part of the table. i deletet non interesting options and added some useful. i think such things like oc´ing shouldnt belong to such tables cause its to specific to endusers and if they havent the know how they shouldnt experiment with this settings. experienced users will find it out by themselfs.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">i spoke to eko and he´s fine with the infos in my table.</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">i will change the boxbased table to but this will take some time...its lot of work</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; font-size: smaller;">sash</td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) &gt;= v5 ==</td><td> </td><td style="background: #eee; font-size: smaller;">== Note on devices with 2MB Flash like WRTG(S) &gt;= v5 ==</td></tr> </table> Sash