Repeating Mode Comparisons

From DD-WRT Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 03:18, 2 September 2008 (edit)
Jaygo (Talk | contribs)
(added positive test results for WDS + WPA2)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 04:05, 2 September 2008 (edit) (undo)
Jaygo (Talk | contribs)
m (clarified wpa2 personal only)
Next diff →
Line 14: Line 14:
* WDS and R/RB both will reduce bandwidth in half (but not necessarily for wired clients (TODO:Confirm)) * WDS and R/RB both will reduce bandwidth in half (but not necessarily for wired clients (TODO:Confirm))
* WDS must be configured on both routers (requires access) and require a compatible WDS implementation. R/RB only needs to configure the repeater and doesn't rely on the main-router's HW or firmware version. * WDS must be configured on both routers (requires access) and require a compatible WDS implementation. R/RB only needs to configure the repeater and doesn't rely on the main-router's HW or firmware version.
-* WDS can support WEP, WPA, and WPA2 (not AES mode) as of v24sp1 (and earlier?). [tested with wrt150n1.1 AP + wrt54g6 R] (TODO: test other hardware). R/RB support all encryption algorithms.+* WDS can support WEP, WPA, and WPA2 Personal (TKIP+AES) as of v24sp1 (and earlier?). [tested with wrt150n1.1 AP + wrt54g6 R] (TODO: test other hardware). R/RB support all encryption algorithms.
* WDS supports building a network of routers, where each repeater can connect to multiple other "main-routers" (WAN-routers) at the same time (TODO: Confirm). R/RB only connects to one router at a time, by SSID. Both WDS and R support connecting multiple repeaters in series ("repeat a repeater"), however a RB must connect to a DHCP serving unit. * WDS supports building a network of routers, where each repeater can connect to multiple other "main-routers" (WAN-routers) at the same time (TODO: Confirm). R/RB only connects to one router at a time, by SSID. Both WDS and R support connecting multiple repeaters in series ("repeat a repeater"), however a RB must connect to a DHCP serving unit.
* WDS does not perform MAC address translation (MAT). R/RB does translate MACs : the main-router sees all connections from clientes which connects through the repeater belonging to the same MAC as the repeater. This causes problems with some applications which relies on a MAC address. * WDS does not perform MAC address translation (MAT). R/RB does translate MACs : the main-router sees all connections from clientes which connects through the repeater belonging to the same MAC as the repeater. This causes problems with some applications which relies on a MAC address.

Revision as of 04:05, 2 September 2008

Contents


WDS vs R (Repeater) vs RB (Repeater Bridge)

This is a summary of issues related to repeating using "WDS" vs "Repeater" vs "Repeater Bridge" modes. Please note that some lines require to be confirmed ("TODO: Confirm"). If you experiment other results than those here indicated, please add your comments providing also your HW and DD-WRT version.

  • On both WDS and R/RB (both R and RB), the repeater can broadcast another SSID. On WDS with WPA, both routers need to have the same SSID (TODO: Confirm).
    • On WDS, both routers need to have the same SSID, which will be broadcasted by both routers (TODO: Confirm).
    • On R/RB, the physical SSID will not only be used for joining the main-router, but also be repeated by the repeater (TODO: Confirm).
    • On R, two SSID with the same name will collide (give problems) (TODO: Confirm). On RB, having the same SSID on the main-router and the repeater allows to "roam", ie. keep a connection active ¿or reconnect? (TODO: CONFIRM) when a client nears the other router.
    • After RC6.2, virtual interfaces have BSSID with MAC address 02:XX:XX:XX:XX:01 for R mode. If the main-router and the repeater broadcast a BSSID with the same MAC, they probabilty will collide. For RB mode the MAC address is 00:XX:XX:XX:XX:01. - redhawk
  • WDS and R/RB both will reduce bandwidth in half (but not necessarily for wired clients (TODO:Confirm))
  • WDS must be configured on both routers (requires access) and require a compatible WDS implementation. R/RB only needs to configure the repeater and doesn't rely on the main-router's HW or firmware version.
  • WDS can support WEP, WPA, and WPA2 Personal (TKIP+AES) as of v24sp1 (and earlier?). [tested with wrt150n1.1 AP + wrt54g6 R] (TODO: test other hardware). R/RB support all encryption algorithms.
  • WDS supports building a network of routers, where each repeater can connect to multiple other "main-routers" (WAN-routers) at the same time (TODO: Confirm). R/RB only connects to one router at a time, by SSID. Both WDS and R support connecting multiple repeaters in series ("repeat a repeater"), however a RB must connect to a DHCP serving unit.
  • WDS does not perform MAC address translation (MAT). R/RB does translate MACs : the main-router sees all connections from clientes which connects through the repeater belonging to the same MAC as the repeater. This causes problems with some applications which relies on a MAC address.

I'm still confused! Which mode should I use?

The following are just some general guidelines for helping you choose the proper repeater mode.

  • Use WDS if
    • you have control over all routers and they each have compatible WDS implementations.
    • you want to repeat your wireless signal and/or connect multiple networks together.
  • Use R (Repeater) if
    • you don't have control over the host access point/router.
    • you want to repeat a wireless signal coming from your ISP.
    • you're staying at a hotel and want to boost an otherwise weak wireless signal to your laptop.
  • Use RB (Repeater Bridge) if
    • your host router/access point doesn't support WDS.
    • you want to repeat a wireless signal and have all clients on the same network (same subnet).

See Also

Linking Routers